Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

"The fintech industry is full of nepotism and privilege"

The privileged founders. And the rest

I’m the founder of a fintech infrastructure company focused on secure payments, fraud prevention, identity-based authorization, and financial access infrastructure. In the process of trying to build, pitch, and establish partnerships, I’ve seen what appears to be a broader pattern across finance and fintech: founders and operators are often judged less on product quality or commercial potential and more on pedigree, presentation, who introduced them, and whether they fit the image of someone the industry is comfortable funding or taking seriously.

From the founder side, there is a major disconnect between how finance publicly talks about innovation and how access actually works in practice. The system often favours people who already have proximity to power - former bankers, repeat founders, elite school networks, well-connected operators, or people with family money.

💥Follow us on WhatsApp for news alerts.💥

By comparison, if you're a founder who didn't come from one of these groups, you will have spend a lot of time simply trying to prove that you belong in the room at all. 

Because of this dynamic, the fintech industry is full of nepotism and privilege. If you don't come from a privileged group, you can't get initial meetings, you can't get banking relationships, you can't get investor attention. Your product is dismissed before it even gets started.   

The issue isn’t just fundraising. It extends into partnership conversations, credibility with institutions, and the broader culture of gatekeeping around financial infrastructure. There is a real story to be told about how difficult it is to build in payments, banking infrastructure, fraud prevention, and compliance-heavy sectors if you are not already socially validated by the ecosystem. 

This is completely different from the public narrative. That narrative is that the fintech industry rewards disruption and merit. This is not the case. It's really a closed network that rewards familiarity, status, and access. The ecosystem is effectively replicating the same exclusionary patterns that it claims technology is supposed to fix.

Kevin Verenhannes is a pseudonym 

Follow me on X. Follow me on LinkedIn. 

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: +44 7537 182250 (SMS, Whatsapp or voicemail). Telegram: @SarahButcher. Signal: sarahbutcher.22  Click here to fill in our anonymous form, or email editortips@efinancialcareers.com. 

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: comments are moderated intermittently by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. You must take sole responsibility for comments you post on this site. We will take reasonable steps to weed out anything that we consider to be offensive or inappropriate.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORKevin Verenhannes Insider Comment
  • Mi
    MissyB
    6 hours ago
    Thanks for sharing. Great insight
  • Ob
    ObservantMollusk
    8 hours ago
    Is privilege still privilege if it's earned? Many ex-bankers or people from prestigious schools fought extremely hard to get into those groups. It's a pretty effective filter for high-potential people, even if some nepo-babies sneak through, but those people tend to want to stay where it's safe and easy rather than a startup which carries more inherent risk. Also, repeat founders are privileged? Of course someone who has already shown they can run a business will be seen as more reliable than someone who hasn't done it before.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.